Billionaire investments in polluting industries, such as fossil fuels and cement, double their weighting in the Standard and Poor group of 500 companies – Oxfam
The investments of just 125 billionaires emit 393 million tonnes of CO2e each year – the equivalent of Ontario and Alberta combined – at an individual annual average that is a million times higher than the global average for 90 per cent of humanity.
Carbon Billionaires: The investment emissions of the world’s richest people, is a report published by Oxfam today, based on a detailed analysis of the investments of 125 of the richest billionaires in some of the world’s biggest companies and the carbon emissions of these investments. These billionaires have a collective $2.4 trillion stake in 183 companies.
The report finds that these billionaires’ investments give an annual average of 3m tonnes of CO2e per person, which is a million times higher than 2.76 tonnes of CO2e which is the average for those living in the bottom 90 per cent income bracket.
The actual figure is likely to be higher still, as published carbon emissions by companies have been shown to underestimate systematically the true level of carbon impact, and billionaires and companies who do not publicly reveal their emissions, so could not be included in the research, are likely to be those with a higher climate impact.
“These few billionaires together have ‘investment emissions’ that equal the carbon footprints of entire countries like France, Egypt or Argentina,” said Ian Thomson, policy manager at Oxfam Canada. “The major and growing responsibility of wealthy people for overall emissions is rarely discussed or considered in climate policy making. This has to change. These billionaire investors at the top of the corporate pyramid have huge responsibility for driving climate breakdown. They have escaped accountability for too long.”
“Emissions from billionaire lifestyles — with their private jets, mega-mansions and yachts – are thousands of times the average person’s, which is already completely unacceptable. But if we look at emissions from their investments, then their carbon emissions are over a million times greater,” said Thomson.
Unlike average people, studies show the investments of the world’s wealthiest individuals account for up to 70 per cent of their emissions. Oxfam has used public data to calculate the “investment emissions” of billionaires with over 10 per cent stakes in a corporation, by allocating them a share of the reported emissions of the companies in which they are invested in proportion to their stake.
The study also found billionaires had an average of 14 per cent of their investments in polluting industries, such as energy and materials like cement. This is twice the rate of polluting industries included in the Standard and Poor 500. Only one billionaire out of the 183 companies in the sample had more than a 10 per cent stake in a renewable energy company.
“We need COP27 to expose and change the role that big companies and their rich investors are playing in profiting from the pollution that is driving the global climate crisis,” said Nafkote Dabi, Climate Change Lead at Oxfam International. “They can’t be allowed to hide or greenwash. We need governments to tackle this urgently by publishing emission figures for the richest people, regulating investors and companies to slash carbon emissions, and taxing wealth and polluting investments.”
The investment choices of billionaires are shaping the future of our economy, for example, by backing high-carbon infrastructure – locking in high emissions for decades to come. The study found that if the billionaires in the sample moved their investments to a fund with stronger environmental and social standards, it could slash their emissions by 75 per cent.
“The super-rich need to be taxed and regulated away from polluting investments that are destroying the planet. Governments must put also in place ambitious regulations and policies that compel corporations to be more accountable and transparent in reporting and radically reducing their emissions,” said Dabi.
Oxfam has estimated that a wealth tax on the world’s super-rich could raise up to $1.4 trillion a year, vital resources that could help low- and middle-income countries – those worst hit by the climate crisis – to adapt, address loss and damage and carry out a just transition to renewable energy. According to the UNEP, adaptation costs for low- and middle-income countries could rise to $300 billion per year by 2030. African countries alone will require $600 billion between 2020 to 2030. Oxfam is also calling for steeply higher tax rates for investments in polluting industries to deter such investments.
The report says that many corporations are off track in setting their climate transition plans, including hiding behind unrealistic and unreliable decarbonization plans with the promise of attaining net zero targets only by 2050. Fewer than one in three of the 183 companies reviewed by Oxfam are working with the Science Based Targets Initiative. Only 16 per cent have set net zero targets.
Ahead of the deliberations at COP27, Oxfam is calling for the following actions:
- Governments to put in place regulations and policies that compel corporations to track and report on scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 GHG emissions, set science-based climate targets with a clear road map to reducing emissions, and while at it ensuring a just transition from the extractive, carbon-intensive economy by securing the future livelihoods of workers and the affected communities.
- Governments should implement a wealth tax on the richest people and an additional steep rate top-up on wealth invested in polluting industries. This will reduce the numbers and power of rich people in our society, drastically reduce their emissions. It will also raise billions that can be used to help countries cope with the brutal impacts of climate breakdown and the loss and damage they incur and fund the global shift to renewable energy.
- Corporations should immediately put in place ambitious and time-bound climate change action plans with short-to-medium term targets in line with global climate change objectives, in a view to reaching carbon neutrality by 2050.
“To meet the global target of keeping warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius, humanity must significantly reduce carbon emissions, which will necessitate radical changes in how investors and corporations conduct business and how public policy drives them,” said Thomson.
